Sarracenia's removed from the Lake District

Discuss Sarracenia, Heliamphora, Darlingtonia, Cephalotus plant care here
User Avatar
Darkrai283
Super User
 
Posts: 2491
Joined: Fri Jul 30, 2010 3:28 pm
Location: Croydon, UK
Thanked: 576 times in 511 posts

Sarracenia's removed from the Lake District

by Darkrai283 » Mon Jan 30, 2012 6:35 pm

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-cumbria-16772704

Its so sad to hear all of this is happening. But its for a good cause I guess. :( I hope the national trust does a good cause to all of these plants by selling them to a reputable nursery or something similar to that instead of just throwing them away. In the article, it says the all the sarrs were pulled out by hand but these S.purpurea's were from the original plants Adrian Slack planted himself in the 1960's so there's likely to be copious amounts of seeds, roots, and small parts of the rhizome left over. Which means that the national trust people would have to come back in a few years time again to remove them from the bogs. All of Adrian Slack's efforts wasted. :(
Richard

My Website

Instagram: Darkrai283
Facebook Page: Richard's Inverts
Youtube Channel: Richard's Inverts

The following users would like to thank Darkrai283 for this post
plantman1001

User Avatar
stitz25b

 
Posts: 2247
Joined: Mon Sep 27, 2010 12:10 pm
Location: plymouth england uk - zone 9, United Kingdom
Thanked: 388 times in 362 posts

Re: Sarracenia's removed from the Lake District

by stitz25b » Mon Jan 30, 2012 7:43 pm

"its bad for the birds that eat them and they arecompeting with sndews"
isnt this nature anyway?
competition
Be polite
Be efficient

User Avatar
David F

 
Posts: 1649
Joined: Sun Jan 02, 2011 8:41 pm
Location: Utah
Thanked: 333 times in 290 posts

Re: Sarracenia's removed from the Lake District

by David F » Mon Jan 30, 2012 10:16 pm

Lol I don't see how such a slow growing plant could possibly affect a place so adversly to the point of removal.
Looking for any drosera capensis via seed, pm me!
I'm interested in any sundews.

Growlist/trading profile:
http://www.flytrapcare.com/phpBB3/david-f-s-growlist-t26539.html

User Avatar
hegory

 
Posts: 193
Joined: Sun Nov 06, 2011 10:37 pm
Thanked: 30 times in 30 posts

Re: Sarracenia's removed from the Lake District

by hegory » Tue Jan 31, 2012 12:50 am

Dang! Send me what they don't want! I would be happy to take what I could!
FUS-RO-DAH!!!!

User Avatar
PeatMoss

 
Posts: 392
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2010 10:01 pm
Location: USDA Zone 3
Thanked: 135 times in 111 posts

Re: Sarracenia's removed from the Lake District

by PeatMoss » Tue Jan 31, 2012 1:12 am

The way things have turned out with many invasive plant species, it must be assumed that any non-native plant species is a threat to biodiversity.

"its bad for the birds that eat them and they arecompeting with sndews"
isnt this nature anyway?
competition


~It's not a "natural" process of competition if one of the species is introduced. The introduction of these species may not have been considered ethically wrong at the time when they were introduced but they are now, so it is necessary that they be removed. I have seen photos of the specific areas where these plants were growing and they were in all likelihood having some type of negative impact on native species. The plants were growing in enormous clumps all over the place, probably crowding out Drosera and also other native non-carnivorous species.

Thanks for reading and sorry for the long post.
My Grow List
Ask not what Sundew can Dew for you but what you can Dew for Sundew

Blog: http://ineptphotographer.blogspot.ca/

User Avatar
Daniel_G
Super User
 
Posts: 5472
Joined: Thu Mar 25, 2010 7:27 pm
Location: Sheffield, South Yorkshire
Thanked: 1193 times in 1102 posts

Re: Sarracenia's removed from the Lake District

by Daniel_G » Tue Jan 31, 2012 7:33 am

The thing is now these purps have become a part of nature, as some have said on the CPUK forum about this article, the ammount of seed will probably be there always. No matter what those seeds will be there, unless the National Trust intends on using flamethrowers all over our bogs, which seems highly unlikely.

It would be very surprising to see the bogs rid of S. Purpurea forever.
Dan Galley, Sarracenia Addict, and Trainee Horticulturist.
If you have any rare Sarracenia that aren't on my growlist, send me a message!


My Trading Post
My Main Update Thread
My Growlist

User Avatar
stitz25b

 
Posts: 2247
Joined: Mon Sep 27, 2010 12:10 pm
Location: plymouth england uk - zone 9, United Kingdom
Thanked: 388 times in 362 posts

Re: Sarracenia's removed from the Lake District

by stitz25b » Tue Jan 31, 2012 10:12 am

what do u think wil happen to the plants?
Be polite
Be efficient

User Avatar
PeatMoss

 
Posts: 392
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2010 10:01 pm
Location: USDA Zone 3
Thanked: 135 times in 111 posts

Re: Sarracenia's removed from the Lake District

by PeatMoss » Tue Jan 31, 2012 2:09 pm

I would think they are just trying to remove enough plants to provide habitat space for the native species, a few growing here and there will not matter as long as they prevent them from setting seed. The population probably got large enough to galvanize the national trust into action.

The thing is now these purps have become a part of nature, as some have said on the CPUK forum about this article, the ammount of seed will probably be there always. No matter what those seeds will be there, unless the National Trust intends on using flamethrowers all over our bogs, which seems highly unlikely.

It would be very surprising to see the bogs rid of S. Purpurea forever.


It is not really possible for a non-native species to become a "part of nature" because they have been in an area for long enough. A non native species will always cause some form of pressure on native species even if these pressures can not be seen. I live in Canada and have seen the effect that many different species of non-native plants from Europe can have on our native environment and I really think that any non native or invasive species should be considered an immediate threat even if the fears are unfounded.

Interesting arguments being made about this issue here:
http://icps.proboards.com/index.cgi?boa ... hread=5296

Another interesting story about non-native insectivores outcompeting native species:
http://icps.proboards.com/index.cgi?boa ... hread=1810
http://icps.proboards.com/index.cgi?boa ... hread=1205

I liked this quote by Aiden:
"They should not be there in the first place. Removal of non natives while it is still possible to do so, is the right thing to do."
My Grow List
Ask not what Sundew can Dew for you but what you can Dew for Sundew

Blog: http://ineptphotographer.blogspot.ca/

User Avatar
Daniel_G
Super User
 
Posts: 5472
Joined: Thu Mar 25, 2010 7:27 pm
Location: Sheffield, South Yorkshire
Thanked: 1193 times in 1102 posts

Re: Sarracenia's removed from the Lake District

by Daniel_G » Tue Jan 31, 2012 2:58 pm

As one person on the CPUK thread said "I dont see them pulling up pansies, wallflowers, tulips etc etc etc, when does an alien species become acceptable?"

These flowers are a part of British nature wouldn't you agree? Even if not originally from the UK.
Dan Galley, Sarracenia Addict, and Trainee Horticulturist.
If you have any rare Sarracenia that aren't on my growlist, send me a message!


My Trading Post
My Main Update Thread
My Growlist

User Avatar
PeatMoss

 
Posts: 392
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2010 10:01 pm
Location: USDA Zone 3
Thanked: 135 times in 111 posts

Re: Sarracenia's removed from the Lake District

by PeatMoss » Tue Jan 31, 2012 3:39 pm

Are the flowers you speak of growing wild in the UK and crowding out native species of wildflower? If they are not, that statement would be like saying "I don't see them pulling up sarracenia from bog gardens, why are they pulling up naturalized specimens?"

Although these plants may be historically important/interesting I believe it is the responsibility of the trust to try to return the native areas to the most pristine natural conditions possible.

I think it is also important to note that although the genus Sarracenia is endangered the species purpurea is not. I think it may be a good idea to send some of the removed plants to nurseries to be propagated since they are heirloom varieties. But I do not think that it is worth the time and effort of the trust to ensure that every plant makes it to a good home, especially considering it is very difficult to adapt wild plants to the conditions of cultivation.
My Grow List
Ask not what Sundew can Dew for you but what you can Dew for Sundew

Blog: http://ineptphotographer.blogspot.ca/

User Avatar
hegory

 
Posts: 193
Joined: Sun Nov 06, 2011 10:37 pm
Thanked: 30 times in 30 posts

Re: Sarracenia's removed from the Lake District

by hegory » Wed Feb 01, 2012 1:42 am

No use cryin over spilled milk. If the plants are well rooted in that area, than they will very likely not be able to erradicate the species. And they can pluck to their hearts content, both sides end up satified (even if slightly). I just see that sight and it makes me want to shed a tear, my own purpurea is fairly slow and seeing all of those mature, beautiful purpureas brings a tear to my eye.
FUS-RO-DAH!!!!

User Avatar
alabama

 
Posts: 312
Joined: Sat May 15, 2010 7:53 pm
Location: Arab Alabama, Alabama
Thanked: 20 times in 20 posts

Re: Sarracenia's removed from the Lake District

by alabama » Sat Feb 04, 2012 12:53 am

this is ridiculous!!!
these plants shouldnt be removed from the natural home they want to eat bugs just as bad as the birds they have to compete with birds each other..
just seems outrageous.
-Tyler Dixon

User Avatar
hegory

 
Posts: 193
Joined: Sun Nov 06, 2011 10:37 pm
Thanked: 30 times in 30 posts

Re: Sarracenia's removed from the Lake District

by hegory » Sat Feb 04, 2012 1:47 am

Tyler, the idea is that because these plants were introduced into the above area, and aren't native to it, that they can cause some environmental damage.
FUS-RO-DAH!!!!

The following users would like to thank hegory for this post
alabama

User Avatar
Oblivion

 
Posts: 1247
Joined: Sun Feb 07, 2010 1:32 pm
Location: adelaide, Australia
Thanked: 220 times in 181 posts

Re: Sarracenia's removed from the Lake District

by Oblivion » Sat Feb 04, 2012 1:54 am

alabama wrote:this is ridiculous!!!
these plants shouldnt be removed from the natural home they want to eat bugs just as bad as the birds they have to compete with birds each other..
just seems outrageous.


a north american pitcher plants "natural home" is not the UK.

if a fox got in your chicken coup you wouldnt be saying "those chickens need to evolve and learn to compete with the fox " would you?

The following users would like to thank Oblivion for this post
alabama, Darkrai283, PeatMoss

User Avatar
Darkrai283
Super User
 
Posts: 2491
Joined: Fri Jul 30, 2010 3:28 pm
Location: Croydon, UK
Thanked: 576 times in 511 posts

Re: Sarracenia's removed from the Lake District

by Darkrai283 » Sat Feb 04, 2012 9:54 am

Oblivion wrote:if a fox got in your chicken coup you wouldnt be saying "those chickens need to evolve and learn to compete with the fox " would you?


:lol: You're a joker Glenn! :lol:
Richard

My Website

Instagram: Darkrai283
Facebook Page: Richard's Inverts
Youtube Channel: Richard's Inverts

The following users would like to thank Darkrai283 for this post
Oblivion


Return to Pitcher Plants

 


  • Related topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests