These ought to be registered!

Re: These ought to be registered!#17729

By Adam -  Thu Jul 23, 2009 5:41 am
Posts:  2892
Joined:  Sat Dec 13, 2008 4:39 am

- Thu Jul 23, 2009 5:41 am #17729

They seemed so into it all. Weird.

Re: These ought to be registered!#25441

By leiter1212 -  Thu Sep 17, 2009 5:13 pm
Posts:  45
Joined:  Mon Sep 14, 2009 3:22 pm

- Thu Sep 17, 2009 5:13 pm #25441

I think it's always very intresting how you can have so many offshoots or types of venus flytraps.

Re: These ought to be registered!#25509

By nesler -  Thu Sep 17, 2009 11:16 pm
Posts:  211
Joined:  Sat Aug 15, 2009 7:06 am

- Thu Sep 17, 2009 11:16 pm #25509

leiter1212 wrote:I think it's always very intresting how you can have so many offshoots or types of venus flytraps.

An old thread, but definitely one worth dredging up. I've never heard of Cudo. What an amazing looking plant. Spider is also kind of cool.

Something new every day.

Re: These ought to be registered!#26612

By gage -  Fri Sep 25, 2009 9:45 pm
Posts:  170
Joined:  Thu Sep 17, 2009 8:23 pm

- Fri Sep 25, 2009 9:45 pm #26612

here is a pic of a cudo from this website

FlytrapCare Carnivorous Plant Forums

Re: These ought to be registered!#17729

Re: These ought to be registered!#25441

Re: These ought to be registered!#25509

Re: These ought to be registered!#26612

Attachments:

Rain

X1643 Sp0nser requests D. Capensis "Narrow Red Leaf" + bonus D. roseana

X1642 8spidersayear requests U. alpina & bonus D. carbarup (gemmae)

X1617 Garden_Nymph requests N. boschiana "BE 3643" x sanguinea "Orange" + Bonus D. scorpioides

X1622 Panman request D. Scopioides plus D. carbarup bonus

Got my Trader Joe's VFTs

Atlanta Georgia Meetup

Dionaea m. ‘Ginormous’

Connecting Carnivorous Plant Growers since 2008

Join us on Twitter @FlytrapStore