- Fri Jul 31, 2015 6:55 pm
#238758
Hi
I stumbled across the following article on sarracenia used for medicine
purpurea purple pitcher plant, Sarracenia purpurea L., is a widely distributed species in North America with
a history of use as both a marketed pain therapy and a traditional medicine in many aboriginal communities.
Among the Cree of Eeyou Istchee in northern Québ
Harris et al. BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine 2012, 12:245 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6882/12/245
RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access
Characterizing the cytoprotective activity of
Sarracenia purpurea L., a medicinal plant that
inhibits glucotoxicity in PC12 cells
Cory S Harris1,2,3*, Muhammad Asim2, Ammar Saleem2, Pierre S Haddad4, John T Arnason2 and Steffany AL Bennett1
Abstract
Background: The purple pitcher plant, Sarracenia purpurea L., is a widely distributed species in North America with a history of use as both a marketed pain therapy and a traditional medicine in many aboriginal communities. Among the Cree of Eeyou Istchee in northern Québec, the plant is employed to treat symptoms of diabetes and the leaf extract demonstrates multiple anti-diabetic activities including cytoprotection in an in vitro model of diabetic neuropathy. The current study aimed to further investigate this activity by identifying the plant parts and secondary metabolites that contribute to these cytoprotective effects.
Methods: Ethanolic extracts of S. purpurea leaves and roots were separately administered to PC12 cells exposed to glucose toxicity with subsequent assessment by two cell viability assays. Assay-guided fractionation of the active extract and fractions was then conducted to identify active principles. Using high pressure liquid chromatography together with mass spectrometry, the presence of identified actives in both leaf and root extracts were determined.
Results: The leaf extract, but not that of the root, prevented glucose-mediated cell loss in a concentration-dependent manner. Several fractions elicited protective effects, indicative of multiple active metabolites, and, following subfractionation of the polar fraction, hyperoside (quercetin-3-O-galactoside) and morroniside were isolated as active constituents. Phytochemical analysis confirmed the presence of hyperoside in the leaf but not root extract and, although morroniside was detected in both organs, its concentration was seven times higher in the leaf.
Conclusion: Our results not only support further study into the therapeutic potential and safety of S. purpurea as an alternative and complementary treatment for diabetic complications associated with glucose toxicity but also identify active principles that can be used for purposes of standardization and quality control.
Keywords: Diabetic neuropathy, Glucose toxicity, Traditional medicine, Quercetin-3-O-galactoside, Morroniside
Background
The purple pitcher plant, Sarracenia purpurea L. (Sarra-ceniaceae), is a perennial carnivorous plant widely dis-tributed across northern North America. By consuming nitrogen from insects trapped within their pitchers (fused leaves), they adapt to nitrogen-poor environments
* Correspondence: cory.harris@mcgill.ca
1Neural Regeneration Laboratory and Ottawa Institute of Systems Biology,
Department of Biochemistry, Microbiology, and Immunology, University of
Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
2Centre for Research in Biopharmaceuticals and Biotechnology, Department
of Biology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
Full list of author information is available at the end of the article
such as bogs and peatlands. Due to this unusual natural history, S. purpurea has received considerable attention from an ecological perspective but, despite a long history of use as a traditional medicine across the continent, the therapeutic potential of the species remains largely unin-vestigated. During the 19th century, S. purpurea served as a treatment for small pox [1,2] and, more recently, as an injected pain reliever marketed as SarapinW, an alka¬line extract of the root that specifically blocks C-fibre excitation [3,4]. In Canada, the plant has long been recognized among aboriginal peoples as medicinal. The Cree of Eeyou Istchee (CEI) in Northern Québec refer to
© 2012 Harris et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Harris et al. BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine 2012, 12:245 Page 2 of 10
http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6882/12/245
S. purpurea as “aygadash”, which translates to ‘frog’s socks’ in reference to the plant’s long slender pitchers and identify preparations from the leaves as beneficial in treating symptoms of diabetes, in particular slow healing infections [5].
The CEI, along with other Canadian First Nations communities, are recognized as some of the highest at-risk populations for T2DM in the world [6,7]. With an average age at diagnosis of just 41 years [8], diabetics also face a greater risk of developing diabetic complica-tions [9,10]. As part of a collaborative research initiative evaluating traditional Cree medicines as culturally rele-vant treatment options for T2DM, our team tested a col-lection of plants, including S. purpurea, used by the CEI to treat symptoms of diabetes in a battery of anti-diabetic assays [11-14]. In addition to insulinotrophic effects in C2C12 muscle cells and 3T3-L1 adipocytes, the ethanolic extract of S. purpurea leaf material demon¬strated cytoprotective activity in two models of diabetic neuropathy, PC12 cells exposed to glucose toxicity or glucose deprivation [11].
Currently, evidence supports the involvement of high, low, and fluctuating glucose concentrations in the patho-physiology of diabetic peripheral neuropathy [15-17]. Whereas hypoglycemia likely contributes to the develop-ment of diabetic neuropathy in Type 1 diabetics and T2DM patients on intense pharmacotherapy, hypergly-cemia is likely the main contributor in populations such as the CEI where T2DM is far more prevalent and compli-ance to modern treatment regimens is generally low [9]. As such, culturally acceptable treatment options could benefit the control of glucotoxic neuropathic complica-tions within the community. In this study, we sought to identify the plant organ sources and the active constituents contributing to the cytoprotective effects of S. purpurea under conditions of glucose toxicity. In comparing activ¬ities of root and leaf extracts, we demonstrate enhanced cytoprotective activity in the leaf extract as predicted by the traditional usage. Through subsequent bioassay-guided fractionation and phytochemical analyses, we identified and quantified marker compounds including biologically active metabolites contributing to cytoprotection.
Methods
Reagents
All cell culture reagents were obtained from Invitrogen (Burlington, ON Canada) and all chemicals were pur-chased through Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, USA) unless otherwise stated. Pure hyperoside (quercetin-3-O-galac-toside), isoquercetin (quercetin-3-O-glucoside), and (-) epicatechin standards were purchased from Extrasynth-èse (Lyon, France). Morroniside was isolated in-house to a purity of over 95% as determined by ultraviolet (UV)
absorption, mass spectrometry (MS) and nuclear mag-netic resonance (NMR) analyses.
Plant materials and extracts
In August 2006, wild samples were collected near Mistis-sini, Quebec, Canada, as per the instructions of commu-nity elders and healers. The specimens were identified as Sarracenia purpurea L. by Dr. A. Cuerrier (Plant Biology Research Institute, Montréal Botanical Garden) and vou-cher specimens were deposited in the Marie-Victorin herbarium (MT) of the Montréal Botanical Garden. Upon collection, loose debris (such as peatmoss) was removed from the plants, which were subsequently partially dried by air (25°C) and transported to the University of Ottawa. Whole plants were separated into leaves (pitchers), roots, and flowers. Leaves were cut open and rinsed clean of insects and dirt. Leaf and root tissues were then dehy-drated using an electric food dehydrator (Nesco/Ameri-can Hervest WI, USA) set to 40°C and processed using a Wiley Mill (2 mm filter) prior to extraction with 80% ethanol as previously described [18]. Dried extracts were prepared for experimental use as stock solutions in di-methyl sulfoxide (DMSO), filtered through a 0.2 .tm nylon membrane filter (Chromatographic Specialties Inc., Brockville, ON, Canada), and serially diluted as required on the day of use to ensure all cultures were exposed to a final concentration of 0.1% DMSO (vehicle).
Cell culture and glucose toxicity assay
PC12-AC cells, a clonal derivative of the PC12 rat adrenal pheochromocytoma cell line (American Tissue Culture Collection) developed in our laboratory [19], were cul¬tured in Roswell Park Memorial Institute medium (RPMI 1640) containing 11 mM glucose and supplemented with 10% horse serum and 5% newborn calf serum. Prior to experimental use, cells were seeded in 96-well plates at a density of 6.25x103 cells/well and incubated overnight at 37°C in 5% CO2 to allow adherence. As described previ¬ously [18], extract toxicity (IC50) was determined by treat¬ing cultures for 96 h in serum-free RPMI 1640 containing 11 mM glucose, 0.025% bovine serum albumin (BSA) to facilitate intracellular passage of hydrophobic compounds, and either 0.1% DMSO (vehicle control) or increasing concentrations of plant extract (0-100 .tg/mL). Similarly, for the glucose toxicity assay, cells were treated for 96 h in serum-free medium supplemented with glucose (to a final concentration of 150 mM), 0.025% BSA, and vehicle control or various concentrations of plant extract below its determined IC50 value.
Cell viability assay
To assess viable cell number, the formazan dye WST (Roche Diagnostics, Laval, QC) was added to each well following 96 h of treatment in normal (11 mM) or high
Harris et al. BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine 2012, 12:245 Page 3 of 10
http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6882/12/245
glucose (150 mM), as described by Harris et al. [18]. After a 60 min incubation with WST, spectrophotomet-ric analysis at 420 nm (formazan) and at 620 nm (refer¬ence) was performed using a Tecan Spectra Shell platereader model A-5082 (Durham, NC) and WinSelect software (Tecan US, Inc.). Viable cell number per well was calculated relative to standard curves produced from wells containing known cell density present on each plate. All treatments were tested in multiple wells over two or three independent experiments (n = 8-15/condi-tion). Data from vehicle-treated control cultures in nor¬mal and high glucose were included on all plates and combined across plates when applicable (n = 12-24). Percent viability was calculated as follows:
% viability 1/4 cell numberðtreatment wellÞ 100
mean cell numberðnormoglucose controlÞ
Cell survival assay
Cell survival was directly assessed by Live/Dead viabil-ity/cytotoxicity assay (Invitrogen) as described previously [20-22]. Viable cells, identified by the conversion of non-fluorescent calcein-AM to fluorescent calcein by intracellular esterases, and dead cells, identified by nu-clear incorporation of cell-impermeable ethidium homo-dimer (ET), were imaged using a DMIR epifluorescent inverted microscope (Leica, Richmond Hill, Canada) coupled with a QICAM digital camera (Quorum Tech-nologies, Guelph, Canada). Images were captured and analysed using OpenLab software v5.05 (Improvision, Lexington, USA). Percent survival was calculated as:
% survival
Viable cell number per wellðcalceinpositive and ETnegativeÞ
1/4
Mean viable cells in vehicle controlðcalceinpositve and ETnegativeÞ
100
Phytochemical characterization
The total phenolic content of root and leaf extracts was determined using the Folin-Ciocalteau method described previously [23,24]. Total phenolic content, calculated rela¬tive to serially diluted quercetin standard analyzed concur¬rently with extracts, were expressed as quercetin equivalents. Chromatographic analyses of root and leaf extracts were performed on an Agilent 1100 high pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) system (Palo Alto, CA, USA) comprised of an autosampler equipped with a 100 μL loop, a quaternary pump with maximum pressure of 400 bars, a column thermostat, a photodiode array de-tector (DAD), and an online atmospheric pressure chem-ical ionization mass selective detector (APCI/MSD VL 1946C). Separations were executed using a validated method on a YMC ODS-AM column (100 × 2 mm I.D.; 3
μm particle size) (Distributed by Waters Inc., Mississauga, Canada) as previously described [25] with minor modifica¬tions. Using aqueous trifluoroacetic acid (TFA, 0.05%), pH 3.4 (solvent A) and methanol (solvent B) as mobile phase, initial conditions 92%:8% (A:B) were held for 2 min fol¬lowed by four linear gradients of 8 – 13% B in 3 min, 13 – 30% B in 15 min, 30 – 60% B in 5 min, and 60 – 100% B in 4 min. Solvent composition was then returned to initial conditions, which were maintained for 7 min to allow re-equilibration. Solubilized samples were filtered through 0.2 μm PTFE membrane filter (Chromatographic Special¬ities Inc., Brockville, ON) prior to analysis. Chromato¬graphic separations were monitored at 325 nm, 230 nm and at 520 nm (band width 4, reference off) by DAD and MSD detection was performed in positive ionization scan mode as optimized previously [25].
Initial compound identifications were performed by matching the UV spectra of eluted peaks with those of standards registered in an on-line Chemstation library. Confirmation of identity was achieved through compari-son of fragmentation patterns and relative retention times with those of reference standards and/or isolated com-pounds identified by NMR. Identified metabolites were quantified on the basis of area under the peak of DAD signals (at 230 nm for morroniside and 280 nm for epica-techin and hyperoside) using calibration curves produced with pure compounds analyzed on the same day (n=3).
Isolation of active compounds
Prior to fractionation by low-pressure column chroma-tography, the crude leaf extract was washed with hexane to remove the lipophilic fraction then dried and solubi-lized in methanol. To separate the more polar com-pounds, distilled water was added to the methanolic solution and the resulting precipitate was collected by centrifugation (the methanol fraction). The remaining sol-uble fraction (water-methanol fraction) was dried by lyophilization. The methanol-water fraction was loaded onto a 100 × 5 cm Sephadex LH-20-packed glass column and separated using a step-wise gradient from 100% water to 100% methanol in 10% increments every 100 min. Col¬lected samples were pooled into 10 fractions based on HPLC profiles, each of which was subsequently tested for cytoprotective activity. Subfractionation of active fractions was conducted using an Agilent 1200 Series semi-preparative HPLC with online DAD and automated time-based fraction collection. Following the subfractionation, additional purification of major peaks was achieved by re-eluting the collected subfractions using peak-based frac¬tion collection. The identity of marker compounds was confirmed by 1H-NMR and 13C-NMR then, in the case of hyperoside, morroniside, and epicatechin, confirmed by comparing retention time, UV and MS data to those of purified standards.
Harris et al. BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine 2012, 12:245 Page 4 of 10
http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6882/12/245
Statistical analyses
Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA tests fol¬lowed by post hoc Dunnett’s t-tests for each extract, frac¬tion, or pure compound relative to normal and high glucose controls, respectively. Differences with p values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant and were represented as * (relative to normal glucose control) or # (relative to high glucose control). P values under 0.01 were considered highly significant (shown as ** or ##).
Results and discussion
Prior to evaluating protective effects, the toxicities of S. purpurea leaf and root extracts were established follow¬ing 96 h exposure to cells in serum-free, normal glucose (11 mM) conditions. IC50 concentrations were defined as the extract concentration eliciting a 50% loss of viable cells relative to control cultures. Cell viability was deter¬mined by mitochondrial dehydrogenase cleavage of the formazan dye WST relative to vehicle-treated (0.1% DMSO) control cells. Both extracts were well-tolerated by cells but, with IC50 concentrations of 129 .tg/mL and 56 .tg/mL, respectively, the leaf extract was less toxic than that of the root.
PC12-AC cells can be differentiated to a peripheral catecholaminergic neuron phenotype by the combination of serum deprivation and treatment with nerve growth factor. As such, these cells have commonly been used to model neuronal stress and serve as an accessible model of diabetic peripheral neuropathy repeatedly used by us and others [11,26-28]. Consistent with previous reports using the current protocol [29], the viability of vehicle-treated PC12-AC cells exposed to elevated glucose concentra¬tions (150 mM) for 96 h was reduced by 40-50% relative to vehicle-treated cells under normal glucose conditions (Figure 1, left panel). This cell loss is glucose-specific and not due to osmotic stress as substitution of D-glucose for L-glucose abolishes toxicity [18,30]. Other studies have demonstrated a similar loss (30%) of PC12 cells exposed to 75 mM high glucose media once differentiated to a neuronal phenotype [28]. To ascertain whether the pro-tective activity of S. purpurea in the glucotoxicity model [11] is organ-specific, root and leaf extracts were evalu-ated at various concentrations below their respective IC50 concentrations (0-30 .tg/mL for root and 0-100 .tg/mL for leaf). The leaf extract reduced glucose-induced cell loss in a concentration-dependent manner up to 30 .tg/mL but failed to provide protection at 100 .tg/mL. Con¬versely, the root had no appreciable effect on glucose tox¬icity at low concentrations but significantly exacerbated cell loss when concentrations approached the IC50 value (Figure 1, right panel).
In order to confirm the cytoprotection offered by S. purpurea leaf extracts, a more direct measure of cell sur-vival was employed since mitochondrial dehydrogenase
activity can be either elevated in dying cells or reduced in metabolically compromised but not terminally damaged cells thereby confounding readouts of WST ab¬sorbance [31]. For this reason, we refer to cell number determined using the WST assay as viable cell number compared to other measures of cell survival. Following the same treatment protocol, serum-deprived cultures were treated with 0.1% DMSO (control) or increasing concentrations of leaf extract. Cell survival was subse¬quently quantified by Live/Dead assay after 96 h. This technique allows for direct assessment of viable and dead (or dying) cells in culture as well as cells that have detached over the course of treatment; viable adherent cells were identified by cleavage of calcein AM to its fluorogenic product by intracellular esterases and dead or dying cells were identified by uptake of the membrane-impermeant ethidium bromide homodimer. Data are expressed relative to surviving cell number in vehicle-treated cultures in normoglucose to account for cell loss over treatment. Upon exposure to high glucose, cell survival in vehicle-treated cultures was compro¬mised by more than 50% (Figure 2A,B). Cell loss was significantly inhibited by the presence of leaf extract with concentration-dependent protection (Figure 2A,B). As observed by WST determination, exposure to leaf ex¬tract (0-25 .tg/mL) did not affect the survival of cells
Harris et al. BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine 2012, 12:245 Page 5 of 10
http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6882/12/245
under serum-free normal glucose conditions (data not shown).
The 80% ethanol extraction of dry leaf material pro-duced a yield of 24.4%. As an initial fractionation step, lipophilic substances were separated into the ‘hexane’ fraction, which represented 6.5% of the crude extract by weight. The resulting defatted fraction was difficult to solubilize at high concentration (>30 mg/mL) in metha¬nol and precipitated significantly with the introduction of water. The concentrated methanolic extract was therefore mixed with an equal part of cold water that, after centrifugation, was separated in two fractions, the precipitate (methanol fraction) consisting of over 30% by weight of the crude extract and the supernatant (metha-nol-water fraction). The dried hexane, methanol and methanol-water fractions were each dissolved in DMSO and assessed for protective effects in high glucose trea¬ted cultures using the WST viability assay (Figure 3A). Remarkably, all three extracts significantly improved cell viability in high glucose media in a concentration-dependent manner (3-15 μg/mL) (Figure 3A).
Because the methanol-water fraction was the most ac-tive, represented the largest fraction of the crude extract, and is likely most similar in chemical content to trad¬itional Cree preparations, this fraction was selected for further fractionation by Sephadex LH20 column chro-matography. When tested in the high glucose paradigm, 4 of the 10 subfractions significantly improved cell via¬bility (Figure 3B, results from inactive fractions not shown). Of these, fractions 3 and 5 were of low yield whereas fractions 1 and 10 were the two largest by weight (29% and 9.0% of the crude extract, respectively).
Fraction 1 (10% MeOH) contained a large amount of saccharides with a single major peak detected by HPLC-DAD/APCI-MS. Once separated by preparative HPLC using peak-based fraction collection, this peak was iden-tified as morroniside, an iridoid glycoside previously reported in the genus [32], by 1H and 13C NMR. Elicit¬ing a similar response as the original fraction (#1), mor-roniside was subsequently purified and confirmed as the active component by WST (cell viability, Figure 3C) and Live/Dead (cell survival, Figure 3D) assays. Because the HPLC trace of fraction #10 (100% MeOH) was fair¬ly complex, a third round of fractionation was performed by semi-preparative HPLC with automated fraction collection. Using time-based peak collection, seven subfractions (10A-G) were collected and prepared for administration to PC12-AC cells. As presented in Figure 3C, only subfraction 10C significantly reduced glucose-induced cell death.
HPLC-DAD/APCI-MS analysis of subfraction 10-C revealed a single peak accounting for > 90% of the total area under the chromatograph with UV and MS data consistent with a quercetin monoglycoside. Using pure quercetin standards as references, in-house library matching and 1H NMR, the unknown peak was identi¬fied as hyperoside (quercetin-3-O-galactoside). Apart from hyperoside, other quercetin glycosides are also known to occur in the species [33]. To verify that this compound was indeed responsible for the cytoprotective effects elicited by the subfraction, a commercially pur¬chased hyperoside standard was tested in the PC12 model, significantly improving survival as determined by Live/Dead assay (Figure 3D).
Harris et al. BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine 2012, 12:245 Page 6 of 10
http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6882/12/245
Harris et al. BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine 2012, 12:245 Page 7 of 10
http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6882/12/245
In previous studies using this model, plant extracts con-taining quercetin derivatives have yielded varying results. Whereas we reported that quercetin glycosides may con-tribute to organ-specific cytoprotective effects of Vacci-nium angustifolium and Picea glauca [18,29], quercetin-containing extracts of Vaccinium vitis-idaea and Kalmia angustifolia were ineffective [12]. To address this incon-sistency, different quercetin glycosides were assessed indi-vidually. Though quercetin and each of its glycosides showed similar responses with increasing activity to an ap-proximate concentration of 5 .tM before protection waned, the 3-O-galactoside (hyperoside) and 3-O-rutino-side were most and least effective, respectively (Figure 4). Within a given extract, both the specific moieties as well as the relative and absolute quantities of quercetin deriva-tives are thus likely to impact overall activity. It is import-ant to note that, consistent with these results in undifferentiated PC12-AC cells, recent studies have also demonstrated protective activity of quercetin following challenge of PC12 cells differentiated to a neuronal pheno¬type with 75 mM high glucose [28].
We next sought to characterize the crude leaf and root extracts to 1) determine whether the identified actives were present in sufficient concentrations to exert their effects, and 2) provide qualitative and quantitative data for quality control purposes. HPLC-DAD/APCI-MSD analysis revealed distinguishing differences between leaf and root extracts, most notably the absence of the large hyperoside peak with the retention time of 10 min in the
root chromatograph (Figure 5). The concentration of hyperoside in the leaf extract, determined relative to a pure standard, was 62.5 .tg/mL (Table 1). Three com-pounds, goodyeroside, epicatechin, and morroniside, were identified in both extracts and serve as species markers. Whereas epicatechin and morroniside were identified by UV and MS spectra and quantified relative to a pure standard, goodyeroside was identified by MS as well as 1H and 13C NMR spectra but was not quantified.
At their detected concentrations within the leaf ex¬tract, both morroniside and hyperoside significantly reduced PC12-AC cell loss but neither was as active as the crude extract. Moreover, assay-guided fractionation revealed significant activity in multiple leaf fractions sug¬gesting additive or synergistic effects that require further investigation to resolve. Recently, morroniside was iso-lated from Shan Zhu Yu (Cornus officinalis SIEB. et ZUCC.), a Traditional Chinese Medicine used for kidney problems [34]. In models of nephropathy and neurode-generation, morroniside demonstrates strong anti-oxi¬dant, reno- and neuroprotective effects [34-36] that likely contribute to Shan Zuh Yu’s beneficial properties.
Harris et al. BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine 2012, 12:245 Page 8 of 10
http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6882/12/245
Table 1 Quantitation of marker compounds in leaf and root extracts of Sarracenia purpurea by HPLC-DAD
Yield a Leaf Root
24.4% 14.6%
mg / g extract mg / g dry plant tissue mg / g extract mg / g dry plant tissue
1 – Morroniside 145.3 ± 1.1 35.5 ± 0.4 21.3 ± 0.6 3.1 ± 0.1
2 – Epicatechin 35.2 ± 1.8 8.6 ± 0.4 48.1 ± 1.7 7.0 ± 0.2
3 – Hyperoside 62.5 ± 1.0 15.3 ± 0.3 n/d n/d
Goodyeroside / /
Total phenolic content b 74.5 ± 6.1 18.2 ± 1.5 146.1 ± 6.2 21.3 ± 0.9
Results are expressed as the mean of three replicates ± the standard error of the mean.
n/d = not detected.
a Yield was calculated as (mass recovered extract / mass dry material) × 100%.
b Expressed as mg quercetin equivalents / g extract as determined using with the Folin Ciocalteau method.
ü Presence detected but not quantified.
With the previously known bioactivities ascribed to quercetin and its glycosides, the isolation of hyperoside as one of the active metabolites responsible for S. pur-purea’s cytoprotective effects is not surprising. Our data are consistent with previous findings indicating that quercetin derivatives display anti-diabetic and neuropro-tective activities relevant to the treatment or prevention of diabetic neuropathy [28]. Three of the major factors contributing to microvascular complications of diabetes, such as neuropathy, include oxidative stress, the forma-tion of advanced glycation endproducts (AGEs), and increased flux through the polyol pathway [37,38]. As established anti-oxidants that inhibit both AGE forma¬tion [39] and aldose reductase activity [40], quercetin derivatives potentially act through a number of mechan-isms. Although this study was not conducted in primary neurons, we have previously confirmed the neuroprotec-tive activity of plant compounds identified through pre-liminary testing in PC12 cells [22] and recent studies have validated this finding in neuronally differentiated PC12 cultures [28]. Moreover, since quercetin and quer-cetin glycosides prevent neuronal death in several in vitro and in vivo models of neurodegeneration [41,42], their activity in the current model is promising.
The observed effects of the leaf extract are, however, of increased interest considering that Sarapin®, a root extract of S. purpurea, is used to relieve pain. Though clinical evidence supporting Sarapin® is incomplete and the putative active constituents remain unidentified, the preparation has been used for a variety of pain-related ailments [3,4]. With further study, S. purpurea products could potentially provide both symptomatic relief and slowed progression of diabetic neuropathy through the preparation of two separate medicines, a leaf tincture and an alkaline root extract.
Conclusions
Our study provides compelling evidence that traditional
preparations of S. purpurea, such as those used by CEI
healers, are based on tangible pharmacological agents and actions in vitro. While restricted to cell-based assays, this provides further experimental support for the traditional use of the plant in CEI communities and has identified active metabolites – hyperoside and mor-roniside – that will guide future investigations into the extract’s mechanism(s) of action focusing on potential synergies as well as additional species markers valuable for quality assurance and standardization purposes.
Abbreviations
AGE: Advanced glycation endproduct; APCI: Atmospheric pressure chemical ionization; BSA: Bovine serum albumin; DAD: Diode array detector; DMSO: Dimethylsulfoxide; DPPH: Diphenylpicrylhydrazyl; HPLC: High pressure liquid chromatography; IC50: Inhibitory concentration 50, concentration at which treatment elicits death of 50% of cells; MS: Mass spectrometer; MSD: Mass selective detector; m/z: Mass over charge ratio; NMR: Nuclear magnetic resonance; PTFE: Polytetrafluoroethylene; RPMI: Roswell Park Memorial Institute medium; SEM: Standard error of the mean; T2DM: Type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Competing interests
The authors have no competing interests.
Authors’ contributions
CSH conducted the cytoprotection assays, processed plant materials, carried out fractionations, performed phytochemical and statistical analyses, and drafted the manuscript. MA conducted NMR experiments and deciphered molecular structures. AS developed the methods of phytochemical analyses and assisted with fractionation. PSH, the project leader, conducts complementary research on S. purpurea and contributed meaningfully to the manuscript. JTA and SALB participated in designing the analytical and cell-based components of the study, respectively, and assisted with data analysis, interpretation, and wrote the manuscript with CSH. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Acknowledgements
These studies were funded by a Canadian Institutes of Health Research Team grant (CTP-79855) to PSH, JTA, and SALB. PSH is a National Research Scientist from the Fondation de la recherche en santé du Québec. CSH was supported by a Canadian Graduate Scholarship. Very special thanks are due to Elizabeth Coon Come, Emma Coon Come, Rene Coon Come, Mable Gunner, Abel Mark, Kathleen Mark, Harriett Matoush, Sandy Matoush, Laurie Petawabano, Smally Petawabano and 24 other Cree Elders and healers from the Cree Nation of Mistissini who kindly agreed to be interviewed. They made this article possible by allowing us to use, for the purposes of this research, their knowledge relating to medicinal plants, transmitted to them by their elders. Their trust has also enabled a useful exchange between Indigenous knowledge and Western science.
Harris et al. BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine 2012, 12:245 Page 9 of 10
http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6882/12/245
Author details
1Neural Regeneration Laboratory and Ottawa Institute of Systems Biology, Department of Biochemistry, Microbiology, and Immunology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada. 2Centre for Research in Biopharmaceuticals and Biotechnology, Department of Biology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada. 3Centre for Indigenous Peoples’ Nutrition and Environment School of Dietetics and Human Nutrition McGill University, Ste. Anne de Bellevue, Québec, Canada. 4Natural Health Products and Metabolic Diseases Laboratory, Department of Pharmacology, Université de Montréal and Montreal Diabetes Research Center, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Received: 20 June 2012 Accepted: 30 November 2012
Published: 5 December 2012
References
1. Moerman D: Native american ethnobotany. Portland: Timber Press; 1998.
2. Grieve M: A Modern Herbal, Revised edn. Surrey (UK): Merchant Book Company Ltd; 1931.
3. Manchikanti L, Pampati V, Bakhit CE, Rivera JJ, Beyer CD, Damron KS, Barnhill RC: Effectiveness of lumbar facet joint nerve blocks in chronic low back pain: a randomized clinical trial. Pain Physician 2001, 4(1):101–117.
4. Rask MR: The omohyoideus myofascial pain syndrome: report of four patients. J Craniomandibular Pract 1984, 2(3):256–262.
5. Leduc C, Coonishish J, Haddad P, Cuerrier A: Plants used by the cree nation of eeyou istchee (quebec, canada) for the treatment of diabetes: a novel approach in quantitative ethnobotany. J Ethnopharmacol 2006, 105(1–2):55–63.
6. Pollex RL, Hanley AJ, Zinman B, Harris SB, Khan HM, Hegele RA: Metabolic syndrome in aboriginal canadians: prevalence and genetic associations. Atherosclerosis 2006, 184(1):121–129.
7. Bruce GB, Kliewer EV, Young TK, et al: Diabetes among the métis of canada: idefining the population, estimating the disease. Canadian Journal of Diabetes 2003, 27:442–448.
8. Kuzmina ED, Lejeune P, Dannenbaum D, Torrie J: Cree Diabetes Information System (CDIS) 2009 Annual report. Quebec: Cree Board of Health and Social Services of James Bay; 2010. Available from: http://creehealth.org/clinical-protocol ... ual-report.
9. Young TK, Reading J, Elias B, O'Neil JD: Type 2 diabetes mellitus in Canada's first nations: status of an epidemic in progress. CMAJ: Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne 2000, 163(5):561–566.
10. Yu CH, Zinman B: Type 2 diabetes and impaired glucose tolerance in aboriginal populations: a global perspective. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2007, 78(2):159–170.
11. Spoor DC, Martineau LC, Leduc C, Benhaddou-Andaloussi A, Meddah B, Harris C, Burt A, Fraser MH, Coonishish J, Joly E, et al: Selected plant species from the cree pharmacopoeia of northern quebec possess anti-diabetic potential. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 2006, 84(8–9):847–858.
12. Harbilas D, Martineau LC, Harris CS, Adeyiwola-Spoor DC, Saleem A, Lambert J, Caves D, Johns T, Prentki M, Cuerrier A, et al: Evaluation of the antidiabetic potential of selected medicinal plant extracts from the canadian boreal forest used to treat symptoms of diabetes: part II. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 2009, 87(6):479–492.
13. Haddad PS, Musallam L, Martineau LC, Harris CS, Lavoie L, Arnason JT, Foster B, Bennett SAL, Johns T, Cuerrier A, et al: Comprehensive evidence-based assessment and prioritization of potential antidiabetic medicinal plants: a case study from canadian eastern james Bay cree traditional medicine. Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine: eCAM 2012, 2012:893426.
14. Harris CS, Beaulieu LP, Fraser MH, McIntyre KL, Owen PL, Martineau LC, Cuerrier A, Johns T, Haddad PS, Bennett SA, et al: Inhibition of advanced glycation end product formation by medicinal plant extracts correlates with phenolic metabolites and antioxidant activity. Planta Med 2011, 77(2):196–204.
15. Dyck PJ, Davies JL, Wilson DM, Service FJ, Melton LJ 3rd, O'Brien PC: Risk factors for severity of diabetic polyneuropathy: intensive longitudinal assessment of the rochester diabetic neuropathy study cohort. Diabetes Care 1999, 22(9):1479–1486.
16. Honma H, Podratz JL, Windebank AJ: Acute glucose deprivation leads to apoptosis in a cell model of acute diabetic neuropathy. J Peripher Nerv Syst 2003, 8(2):65–74.
17. Sugimoto K, Murakawa Y, Sima AA: Diabetic neuropathy–a continuing enigma. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 2000, 16(6):408–433.
18. Harris CS, Lambert J, Saleem A, Coonishish J, Martineau LC, Cuerrier A, Haddad PS, Arnason JT, Bennett SAL: Anti-diabetic activity of extracts from needle, bark, and cone of picea glauca: Organ-specific protection from glucose toxicity and glucose deprivation. Pharm Biol 2008, 46:126–134.
19. Bonin F, Ryan SD, Migahed L, Mo F, Lallier J, Franks DJ, Arai H, Bennett SAL: Anti-apoptotic actions of the platelet activating factor acetylhydrolase I alpha 2 catalytic subunit. J Biol Chem 2004, 279:52425–52436.
20. Harris CS, Mo F, Migahed L, Chepelev L, Haddad PS, Wright JS, Willmore WG, Arnason JT, Bennett SA: Plant phenolics regulate neoplastic cell growth and survival: a quantitative structure-activity and biochemical analysis. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 2007, 85(11):1124–1138.
21. Ryan SD, Harris CS, Carswell CL, Baenziger JE, Bennett SAL: Heterogeneity in the sn-1 carbon chain of platelet-activating factor glycerophospholipids determines pro- or anti-apoptotic signaling in primary neurons. J Lipid Res 2008, 49(10):2250–2258.
22. Ryan SD, Harris CS, Mo F, Lee H, Hou ST, Bazan NG, Haddad PS, Arnason JT, Bennett SA: Platelet activating factor-induced neuronal apoptosis is initiated independently of its G-protein coupled PAF receptor and is inhibited by the benzoate orsellinic acid. J Neurochem 2007, 103(1):88–97.
23. Singleton VaR JA: Colorimetry of total phenolics with phosphomolbdic-phosphotungistic acid reagents. Am J Enol Vitic 1965, 16:144–158.
24. Farsi DA, Harris CS, Reid L, Bennett SA, Haddad PS, Martineau LC, Arnason JT: Inhibition of non-enzymatic glycation by silk extracts from a mexican land race and modern inbred lines of maize (Zea mays). Phytother Res 2008, 22:108–112.
25. Harris CS, Burt AJ, Saleem A, Le PM, Martineau LC, Haddad PS, Bennett SA, Arnason JT: A single HPLC-PAD-APCI/MS method for the quantitative comparison of phenolic compounds found in leaf, stem, root and fruit extracts of Vaccinium angustifolium. Phytochem Anal 2007, 18(2):161–169.
26. Tie L, Xu Y, Lin YH, Yao XH, Wu HL, Li YH, Shen ZF, Yu HM, Li XJ: Down-regulation of brain-pancreas relative protein in diabetic rats and by high glucose in PC12 cells: prevention by calpain inhibitors. J Pharmacol Sci 2008, 106(1):28–37.
27. Woronowicz A, Amith SR, Davis VW, Jayanth P, De Vusser K, Laroy W, Contreras R, Meakin SO, Szewczuk MR: Trypanosome trans-sialidase mediates neuroprotection against oxidative stress, serum/glucose deprivation, and hypoxia-induced neurite retraction in Trk-expressing PC12 cells. Glycobiology 2007, 17(7):725–734.
28. Bournival J, Francoeur MA, Renaud J, Martinoli MG: Quercetin and sesamin protect neuronal PC12 cells from high-glucose-induced oxidation, nitrosative stress, and apoptosis. Rejuvenation Res 2012, 15(3):322–333.
29. Martineau LC, Couture A, Spoor D, Benhaddou-Andaloussi A, Harris C, Meddah B, Leduc C, Burt A, Vuong T, Mai Le P, et al: Anti-diabetic properties of the canadian lowbush blueberry vaccinium angustifolium Ait. Phytomedicine 2006, 13:612–623.
30. Koshimura K, Tanaka J, Murakami Y, Kato Y: Involvement of nitric oxide in glucose toxicity on differentiated PC12 cells: prevention of glucose toxicity by tetrahydrobiopterin, a cofactor for nitric oxide synthase. Neurosci Res 2002, 43(1):31–38.
31. Vogt A, Kalb EN, Lazo JS: A scalable high-content cytotoxicity assay insensitive to changes in mitochondrial metabolic activity. Oncol Res 2004, 14(6):305–314.
32. Hu J, Starks CM, Williams RB, Rice SM, Norman VL, Olson KM, Hough GW, Goering MG, O'Neil-Johnson M, Eldridge GR: Secoiridoid glycosides from the pitcher plant sarracenia alata. Helvetica Chimica Acta 2009, 92(2):273–280.
33. Jay M, Lebreton P: Recherches chiniotaxinomiques sur les plantes vasculaires, 26. Les flavonoides des sarraceniacees, nepenthacees, droseracees et cephalotacees: etude critique de l'ordre des sarraceniales. Naturaliste Cannadienne 1972, 99:607–613.
34. Xu H, Shen J, Liu H, Shi Y, Li L, Wei M: Morroniside and loganin extracted from cornus officinalis have protective effects on rat mesangial cell proliferation exposed to advanced glycation end products by preventing oxidative stress. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 2006, 84(12):1267–1273.
35. Yokozawa T, Yamabe N, Kim HY, Kang KS, Hur JM, Park CH, Tanaka T: Protective effects of morroniside isolated from corni fructus against renal damage in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats. Biol Pharm Bull 2008, 31(7):1422–1428.
Harris et al. BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine 2012, 12:245 Page 10 of 10
http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6882/12/245
36. Wang W, Sun F, An Y, Ai H, Zhang L, Huang W, Li L: Morroniside protects
human neuroblastoma SH-SY5Y cells against hydrogen
peroxide-induced cytotoxicity. Eur J Pharmacol 2009, 613(1–3):19–23.
37. Aronson D: Hyperglycemia and the pathobiology of diabetic
complications. Adv Cardiol 2008, 45:1–16.
38. Brownlee M: The pathobiology of diabetic complications: a unifying
mechanism. Diabetes 2005, 54(6):1615–1625.
39. Wu CH, Yen GC: Inhibitory effect of naturally occurring flavonoids on the
formation of advanced glycation endproducts. J Agric Food Chem 2005,
53(8):3167–3173.
40. Varma SD: Inhibition of aldose reductase by flavonoids: possible
attenuation of diabetic complications. Prog Clin Biol Res 1986,
213:343–358.
41. Ha HJ, Kwon YS, Park SM, Shin T, Park JH, Kim HC, Kwon MS, Wie MB:
Quercetin attenuates oxygen-glucose deprivation- and
excitotoxin-induced neurotoxicity in primary cortical cell cultures.
Biol Pharm Bull 2003, 26(4):544–546.
42. Spencer JP, Rice-Evans C, Williams RJ: Modulation of pro-survival
Akt/protein kinase B and ERK1/2 signaling cascades by quercetin and its
in vivo metabolites underlie their action on neuronal viability.
J Biol Chem 2003, 278(37):34783–34793.
doi:10.1186/1472-6882-12-245
Cite this article as: Harris et al.: Characterizing the cytoprotective activity of Sarracenia purpurea L., a medicinal plant that inhibits glucotoxicity in PC12
I stumbled across the following article on sarracenia used for medicine
purpurea purple pitcher plant, Sarracenia purpurea L., is a widely distributed species in North America with
a history of use as both a marketed pain therapy and a traditional medicine in many aboriginal communities.
Among the Cree of Eeyou Istchee in northern Québ
Harris et al. BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine 2012, 12:245 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6882/12/245
RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access
Characterizing the cytoprotective activity of
Sarracenia purpurea L., a medicinal plant that
inhibits glucotoxicity in PC12 cells
Cory S Harris1,2,3*, Muhammad Asim2, Ammar Saleem2, Pierre S Haddad4, John T Arnason2 and Steffany AL Bennett1
Abstract
Background: The purple pitcher plant, Sarracenia purpurea L., is a widely distributed species in North America with a history of use as both a marketed pain therapy and a traditional medicine in many aboriginal communities. Among the Cree of Eeyou Istchee in northern Québec, the plant is employed to treat symptoms of diabetes and the leaf extract demonstrates multiple anti-diabetic activities including cytoprotection in an in vitro model of diabetic neuropathy. The current study aimed to further investigate this activity by identifying the plant parts and secondary metabolites that contribute to these cytoprotective effects.
Methods: Ethanolic extracts of S. purpurea leaves and roots were separately administered to PC12 cells exposed to glucose toxicity with subsequent assessment by two cell viability assays. Assay-guided fractionation of the active extract and fractions was then conducted to identify active principles. Using high pressure liquid chromatography together with mass spectrometry, the presence of identified actives in both leaf and root extracts were determined.
Results: The leaf extract, but not that of the root, prevented glucose-mediated cell loss in a concentration-dependent manner. Several fractions elicited protective effects, indicative of multiple active metabolites, and, following subfractionation of the polar fraction, hyperoside (quercetin-3-O-galactoside) and morroniside were isolated as active constituents. Phytochemical analysis confirmed the presence of hyperoside in the leaf but not root extract and, although morroniside was detected in both organs, its concentration was seven times higher in the leaf.
Conclusion: Our results not only support further study into the therapeutic potential and safety of S. purpurea as an alternative and complementary treatment for diabetic complications associated with glucose toxicity but also identify active principles that can be used for purposes of standardization and quality control.
Keywords: Diabetic neuropathy, Glucose toxicity, Traditional medicine, Quercetin-3-O-galactoside, Morroniside
Background
The purple pitcher plant, Sarracenia purpurea L. (Sarra-ceniaceae), is a perennial carnivorous plant widely dis-tributed across northern North America. By consuming nitrogen from insects trapped within their pitchers (fused leaves), they adapt to nitrogen-poor environments
* Correspondence: cory.harris@mcgill.ca
1Neural Regeneration Laboratory and Ottawa Institute of Systems Biology,
Department of Biochemistry, Microbiology, and Immunology, University of
Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
2Centre for Research in Biopharmaceuticals and Biotechnology, Department
of Biology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
Full list of author information is available at the end of the article
such as bogs and peatlands. Due to this unusual natural history, S. purpurea has received considerable attention from an ecological perspective but, despite a long history of use as a traditional medicine across the continent, the therapeutic potential of the species remains largely unin-vestigated. During the 19th century, S. purpurea served as a treatment for small pox [1,2] and, more recently, as an injected pain reliever marketed as SarapinW, an alka¬line extract of the root that specifically blocks C-fibre excitation [3,4]. In Canada, the plant has long been recognized among aboriginal peoples as medicinal. The Cree of Eeyou Istchee (CEI) in Northern Québec refer to
© 2012 Harris et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Harris et al. BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine 2012, 12:245 Page 2 of 10
http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6882/12/245
S. purpurea as “aygadash”, which translates to ‘frog’s socks’ in reference to the plant’s long slender pitchers and identify preparations from the leaves as beneficial in treating symptoms of diabetes, in particular slow healing infections [5].
The CEI, along with other Canadian First Nations communities, are recognized as some of the highest at-risk populations for T2DM in the world [6,7]. With an average age at diagnosis of just 41 years [8], diabetics also face a greater risk of developing diabetic complica-tions [9,10]. As part of a collaborative research initiative evaluating traditional Cree medicines as culturally rele-vant treatment options for T2DM, our team tested a col-lection of plants, including S. purpurea, used by the CEI to treat symptoms of diabetes in a battery of anti-diabetic assays [11-14]. In addition to insulinotrophic effects in C2C12 muscle cells and 3T3-L1 adipocytes, the ethanolic extract of S. purpurea leaf material demon¬strated cytoprotective activity in two models of diabetic neuropathy, PC12 cells exposed to glucose toxicity or glucose deprivation [11].
Currently, evidence supports the involvement of high, low, and fluctuating glucose concentrations in the patho-physiology of diabetic peripheral neuropathy [15-17]. Whereas hypoglycemia likely contributes to the develop-ment of diabetic neuropathy in Type 1 diabetics and T2DM patients on intense pharmacotherapy, hypergly-cemia is likely the main contributor in populations such as the CEI where T2DM is far more prevalent and compli-ance to modern treatment regimens is generally low [9]. As such, culturally acceptable treatment options could benefit the control of glucotoxic neuropathic complica-tions within the community. In this study, we sought to identify the plant organ sources and the active constituents contributing to the cytoprotective effects of S. purpurea under conditions of glucose toxicity. In comparing activ¬ities of root and leaf extracts, we demonstrate enhanced cytoprotective activity in the leaf extract as predicted by the traditional usage. Through subsequent bioassay-guided fractionation and phytochemical analyses, we identified and quantified marker compounds including biologically active metabolites contributing to cytoprotection.
Methods
Reagents
All cell culture reagents were obtained from Invitrogen (Burlington, ON Canada) and all chemicals were pur-chased through Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, USA) unless otherwise stated. Pure hyperoside (quercetin-3-O-galac-toside), isoquercetin (quercetin-3-O-glucoside), and (-) epicatechin standards were purchased from Extrasynth-èse (Lyon, France). Morroniside was isolated in-house to a purity of over 95% as determined by ultraviolet (UV)
absorption, mass spectrometry (MS) and nuclear mag-netic resonance (NMR) analyses.
Plant materials and extracts
In August 2006, wild samples were collected near Mistis-sini, Quebec, Canada, as per the instructions of commu-nity elders and healers. The specimens were identified as Sarracenia purpurea L. by Dr. A. Cuerrier (Plant Biology Research Institute, Montréal Botanical Garden) and vou-cher specimens were deposited in the Marie-Victorin herbarium (MT) of the Montréal Botanical Garden. Upon collection, loose debris (such as peatmoss) was removed from the plants, which were subsequently partially dried by air (25°C) and transported to the University of Ottawa. Whole plants were separated into leaves (pitchers), roots, and flowers. Leaves were cut open and rinsed clean of insects and dirt. Leaf and root tissues were then dehy-drated using an electric food dehydrator (Nesco/Ameri-can Hervest WI, USA) set to 40°C and processed using a Wiley Mill (2 mm filter) prior to extraction with 80% ethanol as previously described [18]. Dried extracts were prepared for experimental use as stock solutions in di-methyl sulfoxide (DMSO), filtered through a 0.2 .tm nylon membrane filter (Chromatographic Specialties Inc., Brockville, ON, Canada), and serially diluted as required on the day of use to ensure all cultures were exposed to a final concentration of 0.1% DMSO (vehicle).
Cell culture and glucose toxicity assay
PC12-AC cells, a clonal derivative of the PC12 rat adrenal pheochromocytoma cell line (American Tissue Culture Collection) developed in our laboratory [19], were cul¬tured in Roswell Park Memorial Institute medium (RPMI 1640) containing 11 mM glucose and supplemented with 10% horse serum and 5% newborn calf serum. Prior to experimental use, cells were seeded in 96-well plates at a density of 6.25x103 cells/well and incubated overnight at 37°C in 5% CO2 to allow adherence. As described previ¬ously [18], extract toxicity (IC50) was determined by treat¬ing cultures for 96 h in serum-free RPMI 1640 containing 11 mM glucose, 0.025% bovine serum albumin (BSA) to facilitate intracellular passage of hydrophobic compounds, and either 0.1% DMSO (vehicle control) or increasing concentrations of plant extract (0-100 .tg/mL). Similarly, for the glucose toxicity assay, cells were treated for 96 h in serum-free medium supplemented with glucose (to a final concentration of 150 mM), 0.025% BSA, and vehicle control or various concentrations of plant extract below its determined IC50 value.
Cell viability assay
To assess viable cell number, the formazan dye WST (Roche Diagnostics, Laval, QC) was added to each well following 96 h of treatment in normal (11 mM) or high
Harris et al. BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine 2012, 12:245 Page 3 of 10
http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6882/12/245
glucose (150 mM), as described by Harris et al. [18]. After a 60 min incubation with WST, spectrophotomet-ric analysis at 420 nm (formazan) and at 620 nm (refer¬ence) was performed using a Tecan Spectra Shell platereader model A-5082 (Durham, NC) and WinSelect software (Tecan US, Inc.). Viable cell number per well was calculated relative to standard curves produced from wells containing known cell density present on each plate. All treatments were tested in multiple wells over two or three independent experiments (n = 8-15/condi-tion). Data from vehicle-treated control cultures in nor¬mal and high glucose were included on all plates and combined across plates when applicable (n = 12-24). Percent viability was calculated as follows:
% viability 1/4 cell numberðtreatment wellÞ 100
mean cell numberðnormoglucose controlÞ
Cell survival assay
Cell survival was directly assessed by Live/Dead viabil-ity/cytotoxicity assay (Invitrogen) as described previously [20-22]. Viable cells, identified by the conversion of non-fluorescent calcein-AM to fluorescent calcein by intracellular esterases, and dead cells, identified by nu-clear incorporation of cell-impermeable ethidium homo-dimer (ET), were imaged using a DMIR epifluorescent inverted microscope (Leica, Richmond Hill, Canada) coupled with a QICAM digital camera (Quorum Tech-nologies, Guelph, Canada). Images were captured and analysed using OpenLab software v5.05 (Improvision, Lexington, USA). Percent survival was calculated as:
% survival
Viable cell number per wellðcalceinpositive and ETnegativeÞ
1/4
Mean viable cells in vehicle controlðcalceinpositve and ETnegativeÞ
100
Phytochemical characterization
The total phenolic content of root and leaf extracts was determined using the Folin-Ciocalteau method described previously [23,24]. Total phenolic content, calculated rela¬tive to serially diluted quercetin standard analyzed concur¬rently with extracts, were expressed as quercetin equivalents. Chromatographic analyses of root and leaf extracts were performed on an Agilent 1100 high pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) system (Palo Alto, CA, USA) comprised of an autosampler equipped with a 100 μL loop, a quaternary pump with maximum pressure of 400 bars, a column thermostat, a photodiode array de-tector (DAD), and an online atmospheric pressure chem-ical ionization mass selective detector (APCI/MSD VL 1946C). Separations were executed using a validated method on a YMC ODS-AM column (100 × 2 mm I.D.; 3
μm particle size) (Distributed by Waters Inc., Mississauga, Canada) as previously described [25] with minor modifica¬tions. Using aqueous trifluoroacetic acid (TFA, 0.05%), pH 3.4 (solvent A) and methanol (solvent B) as mobile phase, initial conditions 92%:8% (A:B) were held for 2 min fol¬lowed by four linear gradients of 8 – 13% B in 3 min, 13 – 30% B in 15 min, 30 – 60% B in 5 min, and 60 – 100% B in 4 min. Solvent composition was then returned to initial conditions, which were maintained for 7 min to allow re-equilibration. Solubilized samples were filtered through 0.2 μm PTFE membrane filter (Chromatographic Special¬ities Inc., Brockville, ON) prior to analysis. Chromato¬graphic separations were monitored at 325 nm, 230 nm and at 520 nm (band width 4, reference off) by DAD and MSD detection was performed in positive ionization scan mode as optimized previously [25].
Initial compound identifications were performed by matching the UV spectra of eluted peaks with those of standards registered in an on-line Chemstation library. Confirmation of identity was achieved through compari-son of fragmentation patterns and relative retention times with those of reference standards and/or isolated com-pounds identified by NMR. Identified metabolites were quantified on the basis of area under the peak of DAD signals (at 230 nm for morroniside and 280 nm for epica-techin and hyperoside) using calibration curves produced with pure compounds analyzed on the same day (n=3).
Isolation of active compounds
Prior to fractionation by low-pressure column chroma-tography, the crude leaf extract was washed with hexane to remove the lipophilic fraction then dried and solubi-lized in methanol. To separate the more polar com-pounds, distilled water was added to the methanolic solution and the resulting precipitate was collected by centrifugation (the methanol fraction). The remaining sol-uble fraction (water-methanol fraction) was dried by lyophilization. The methanol-water fraction was loaded onto a 100 × 5 cm Sephadex LH-20-packed glass column and separated using a step-wise gradient from 100% water to 100% methanol in 10% increments every 100 min. Col¬lected samples were pooled into 10 fractions based on HPLC profiles, each of which was subsequently tested for cytoprotective activity. Subfractionation of active fractions was conducted using an Agilent 1200 Series semi-preparative HPLC with online DAD and automated time-based fraction collection. Following the subfractionation, additional purification of major peaks was achieved by re-eluting the collected subfractions using peak-based frac¬tion collection. The identity of marker compounds was confirmed by 1H-NMR and 13C-NMR then, in the case of hyperoside, morroniside, and epicatechin, confirmed by comparing retention time, UV and MS data to those of purified standards.
Harris et al. BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine 2012, 12:245 Page 4 of 10
http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6882/12/245
Statistical analyses
Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA tests fol¬lowed by post hoc Dunnett’s t-tests for each extract, frac¬tion, or pure compound relative to normal and high glucose controls, respectively. Differences with p values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant and were represented as * (relative to normal glucose control) or # (relative to high glucose control). P values under 0.01 were considered highly significant (shown as ** or ##).
Results and discussion
Prior to evaluating protective effects, the toxicities of S. purpurea leaf and root extracts were established follow¬ing 96 h exposure to cells in serum-free, normal glucose (11 mM) conditions. IC50 concentrations were defined as the extract concentration eliciting a 50% loss of viable cells relative to control cultures. Cell viability was deter¬mined by mitochondrial dehydrogenase cleavage of the formazan dye WST relative to vehicle-treated (0.1% DMSO) control cells. Both extracts were well-tolerated by cells but, with IC50 concentrations of 129 .tg/mL and 56 .tg/mL, respectively, the leaf extract was less toxic than that of the root.
PC12-AC cells can be differentiated to a peripheral catecholaminergic neuron phenotype by the combination of serum deprivation and treatment with nerve growth factor. As such, these cells have commonly been used to model neuronal stress and serve as an accessible model of diabetic peripheral neuropathy repeatedly used by us and others [11,26-28]. Consistent with previous reports using the current protocol [29], the viability of vehicle-treated PC12-AC cells exposed to elevated glucose concentra¬tions (150 mM) for 96 h was reduced by 40-50% relative to vehicle-treated cells under normal glucose conditions (Figure 1, left panel). This cell loss is glucose-specific and not due to osmotic stress as substitution of D-glucose for L-glucose abolishes toxicity [18,30]. Other studies have demonstrated a similar loss (30%) of PC12 cells exposed to 75 mM high glucose media once differentiated to a neuronal phenotype [28]. To ascertain whether the pro-tective activity of S. purpurea in the glucotoxicity model [11] is organ-specific, root and leaf extracts were evalu-ated at various concentrations below their respective IC50 concentrations (0-30 .tg/mL for root and 0-100 .tg/mL for leaf). The leaf extract reduced glucose-induced cell loss in a concentration-dependent manner up to 30 .tg/mL but failed to provide protection at 100 .tg/mL. Con¬versely, the root had no appreciable effect on glucose tox¬icity at low concentrations but significantly exacerbated cell loss when concentrations approached the IC50 value (Figure 1, right panel).
In order to confirm the cytoprotection offered by S. purpurea leaf extracts, a more direct measure of cell sur-vival was employed since mitochondrial dehydrogenase
activity can be either elevated in dying cells or reduced in metabolically compromised but not terminally damaged cells thereby confounding readouts of WST ab¬sorbance [31]. For this reason, we refer to cell number determined using the WST assay as viable cell number compared to other measures of cell survival. Following the same treatment protocol, serum-deprived cultures were treated with 0.1% DMSO (control) or increasing concentrations of leaf extract. Cell survival was subse¬quently quantified by Live/Dead assay after 96 h. This technique allows for direct assessment of viable and dead (or dying) cells in culture as well as cells that have detached over the course of treatment; viable adherent cells were identified by cleavage of calcein AM to its fluorogenic product by intracellular esterases and dead or dying cells were identified by uptake of the membrane-impermeant ethidium bromide homodimer. Data are expressed relative to surviving cell number in vehicle-treated cultures in normoglucose to account for cell loss over treatment. Upon exposure to high glucose, cell survival in vehicle-treated cultures was compro¬mised by more than 50% (Figure 2A,B). Cell loss was significantly inhibited by the presence of leaf extract with concentration-dependent protection (Figure 2A,B). As observed by WST determination, exposure to leaf ex¬tract (0-25 .tg/mL) did not affect the survival of cells
Harris et al. BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine 2012, 12:245 Page 5 of 10
http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6882/12/245
under serum-free normal glucose conditions (data not shown).
The 80% ethanol extraction of dry leaf material pro-duced a yield of 24.4%. As an initial fractionation step, lipophilic substances were separated into the ‘hexane’ fraction, which represented 6.5% of the crude extract by weight. The resulting defatted fraction was difficult to solubilize at high concentration (>30 mg/mL) in metha¬nol and precipitated significantly with the introduction of water. The concentrated methanolic extract was therefore mixed with an equal part of cold water that, after centrifugation, was separated in two fractions, the precipitate (methanol fraction) consisting of over 30% by weight of the crude extract and the supernatant (metha-nol-water fraction). The dried hexane, methanol and methanol-water fractions were each dissolved in DMSO and assessed for protective effects in high glucose trea¬ted cultures using the WST viability assay (Figure 3A). Remarkably, all three extracts significantly improved cell viability in high glucose media in a concentration-dependent manner (3-15 μg/mL) (Figure 3A).
Because the methanol-water fraction was the most ac-tive, represented the largest fraction of the crude extract, and is likely most similar in chemical content to trad¬itional Cree preparations, this fraction was selected for further fractionation by Sephadex LH20 column chro-matography. When tested in the high glucose paradigm, 4 of the 10 subfractions significantly improved cell via¬bility (Figure 3B, results from inactive fractions not shown). Of these, fractions 3 and 5 were of low yield whereas fractions 1 and 10 were the two largest by weight (29% and 9.0% of the crude extract, respectively).
Fraction 1 (10% MeOH) contained a large amount of saccharides with a single major peak detected by HPLC-DAD/APCI-MS. Once separated by preparative HPLC using peak-based fraction collection, this peak was iden-tified as morroniside, an iridoid glycoside previously reported in the genus [32], by 1H and 13C NMR. Elicit¬ing a similar response as the original fraction (#1), mor-roniside was subsequently purified and confirmed as the active component by WST (cell viability, Figure 3C) and Live/Dead (cell survival, Figure 3D) assays. Because the HPLC trace of fraction #10 (100% MeOH) was fair¬ly complex, a third round of fractionation was performed by semi-preparative HPLC with automated fraction collection. Using time-based peak collection, seven subfractions (10A-G) were collected and prepared for administration to PC12-AC cells. As presented in Figure 3C, only subfraction 10C significantly reduced glucose-induced cell death.
HPLC-DAD/APCI-MS analysis of subfraction 10-C revealed a single peak accounting for > 90% of the total area under the chromatograph with UV and MS data consistent with a quercetin monoglycoside. Using pure quercetin standards as references, in-house library matching and 1H NMR, the unknown peak was identi¬fied as hyperoside (quercetin-3-O-galactoside). Apart from hyperoside, other quercetin glycosides are also known to occur in the species [33]. To verify that this compound was indeed responsible for the cytoprotective effects elicited by the subfraction, a commercially pur¬chased hyperoside standard was tested in the PC12 model, significantly improving survival as determined by Live/Dead assay (Figure 3D).
Harris et al. BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine 2012, 12:245 Page 6 of 10
http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6882/12/245
Harris et al. BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine 2012, 12:245 Page 7 of 10
http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6882/12/245
In previous studies using this model, plant extracts con-taining quercetin derivatives have yielded varying results. Whereas we reported that quercetin glycosides may con-tribute to organ-specific cytoprotective effects of Vacci-nium angustifolium and Picea glauca [18,29], quercetin-containing extracts of Vaccinium vitis-idaea and Kalmia angustifolia were ineffective [12]. To address this incon-sistency, different quercetin glycosides were assessed indi-vidually. Though quercetin and each of its glycosides showed similar responses with increasing activity to an ap-proximate concentration of 5 .tM before protection waned, the 3-O-galactoside (hyperoside) and 3-O-rutino-side were most and least effective, respectively (Figure 4). Within a given extract, both the specific moieties as well as the relative and absolute quantities of quercetin deriva-tives are thus likely to impact overall activity. It is import-ant to note that, consistent with these results in undifferentiated PC12-AC cells, recent studies have also demonstrated protective activity of quercetin following challenge of PC12 cells differentiated to a neuronal pheno¬type with 75 mM high glucose [28].
We next sought to characterize the crude leaf and root extracts to 1) determine whether the identified actives were present in sufficient concentrations to exert their effects, and 2) provide qualitative and quantitative data for quality control purposes. HPLC-DAD/APCI-MSD analysis revealed distinguishing differences between leaf and root extracts, most notably the absence of the large hyperoside peak with the retention time of 10 min in the
root chromatograph (Figure 5). The concentration of hyperoside in the leaf extract, determined relative to a pure standard, was 62.5 .tg/mL (Table 1). Three com-pounds, goodyeroside, epicatechin, and morroniside, were identified in both extracts and serve as species markers. Whereas epicatechin and morroniside were identified by UV and MS spectra and quantified relative to a pure standard, goodyeroside was identified by MS as well as 1H and 13C NMR spectra but was not quantified.
At their detected concentrations within the leaf ex¬tract, both morroniside and hyperoside significantly reduced PC12-AC cell loss but neither was as active as the crude extract. Moreover, assay-guided fractionation revealed significant activity in multiple leaf fractions sug¬gesting additive or synergistic effects that require further investigation to resolve. Recently, morroniside was iso-lated from Shan Zhu Yu (Cornus officinalis SIEB. et ZUCC.), a Traditional Chinese Medicine used for kidney problems [34]. In models of nephropathy and neurode-generation, morroniside demonstrates strong anti-oxi¬dant, reno- and neuroprotective effects [34-36] that likely contribute to Shan Zuh Yu’s beneficial properties.
Harris et al. BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine 2012, 12:245 Page 8 of 10
http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6882/12/245
Table 1 Quantitation of marker compounds in leaf and root extracts of Sarracenia purpurea by HPLC-DAD
Yield a Leaf Root
24.4% 14.6%
mg / g extract mg / g dry plant tissue mg / g extract mg / g dry plant tissue
1 – Morroniside 145.3 ± 1.1 35.5 ± 0.4 21.3 ± 0.6 3.1 ± 0.1
2 – Epicatechin 35.2 ± 1.8 8.6 ± 0.4 48.1 ± 1.7 7.0 ± 0.2
3 – Hyperoside 62.5 ± 1.0 15.3 ± 0.3 n/d n/d
Goodyeroside / /
Total phenolic content b 74.5 ± 6.1 18.2 ± 1.5 146.1 ± 6.2 21.3 ± 0.9
Results are expressed as the mean of three replicates ± the standard error of the mean.
n/d = not detected.
a Yield was calculated as (mass recovered extract / mass dry material) × 100%.
b Expressed as mg quercetin equivalents / g extract as determined using with the Folin Ciocalteau method.
ü Presence detected but not quantified.
With the previously known bioactivities ascribed to quercetin and its glycosides, the isolation of hyperoside as one of the active metabolites responsible for S. pur-purea’s cytoprotective effects is not surprising. Our data are consistent with previous findings indicating that quercetin derivatives display anti-diabetic and neuropro-tective activities relevant to the treatment or prevention of diabetic neuropathy [28]. Three of the major factors contributing to microvascular complications of diabetes, such as neuropathy, include oxidative stress, the forma-tion of advanced glycation endproducts (AGEs), and increased flux through the polyol pathway [37,38]. As established anti-oxidants that inhibit both AGE forma¬tion [39] and aldose reductase activity [40], quercetin derivatives potentially act through a number of mechan-isms. Although this study was not conducted in primary neurons, we have previously confirmed the neuroprotec-tive activity of plant compounds identified through pre-liminary testing in PC12 cells [22] and recent studies have validated this finding in neuronally differentiated PC12 cultures [28]. Moreover, since quercetin and quer-cetin glycosides prevent neuronal death in several in vitro and in vivo models of neurodegeneration [41,42], their activity in the current model is promising.
The observed effects of the leaf extract are, however, of increased interest considering that Sarapin®, a root extract of S. purpurea, is used to relieve pain. Though clinical evidence supporting Sarapin® is incomplete and the putative active constituents remain unidentified, the preparation has been used for a variety of pain-related ailments [3,4]. With further study, S. purpurea products could potentially provide both symptomatic relief and slowed progression of diabetic neuropathy through the preparation of two separate medicines, a leaf tincture and an alkaline root extract.
Conclusions
Our study provides compelling evidence that traditional
preparations of S. purpurea, such as those used by CEI
healers, are based on tangible pharmacological agents and actions in vitro. While restricted to cell-based assays, this provides further experimental support for the traditional use of the plant in CEI communities and has identified active metabolites – hyperoside and mor-roniside – that will guide future investigations into the extract’s mechanism(s) of action focusing on potential synergies as well as additional species markers valuable for quality assurance and standardization purposes.
Abbreviations
AGE: Advanced glycation endproduct; APCI: Atmospheric pressure chemical ionization; BSA: Bovine serum albumin; DAD: Diode array detector; DMSO: Dimethylsulfoxide; DPPH: Diphenylpicrylhydrazyl; HPLC: High pressure liquid chromatography; IC50: Inhibitory concentration 50, concentration at which treatment elicits death of 50% of cells; MS: Mass spectrometer; MSD: Mass selective detector; m/z: Mass over charge ratio; NMR: Nuclear magnetic resonance; PTFE: Polytetrafluoroethylene; RPMI: Roswell Park Memorial Institute medium; SEM: Standard error of the mean; T2DM: Type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Competing interests
The authors have no competing interests.
Authors’ contributions
CSH conducted the cytoprotection assays, processed plant materials, carried out fractionations, performed phytochemical and statistical analyses, and drafted the manuscript. MA conducted NMR experiments and deciphered molecular structures. AS developed the methods of phytochemical analyses and assisted with fractionation. PSH, the project leader, conducts complementary research on S. purpurea and contributed meaningfully to the manuscript. JTA and SALB participated in designing the analytical and cell-based components of the study, respectively, and assisted with data analysis, interpretation, and wrote the manuscript with CSH. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Acknowledgements
These studies were funded by a Canadian Institutes of Health Research Team grant (CTP-79855) to PSH, JTA, and SALB. PSH is a National Research Scientist from the Fondation de la recherche en santé du Québec. CSH was supported by a Canadian Graduate Scholarship. Very special thanks are due to Elizabeth Coon Come, Emma Coon Come, Rene Coon Come, Mable Gunner, Abel Mark, Kathleen Mark, Harriett Matoush, Sandy Matoush, Laurie Petawabano, Smally Petawabano and 24 other Cree Elders and healers from the Cree Nation of Mistissini who kindly agreed to be interviewed. They made this article possible by allowing us to use, for the purposes of this research, their knowledge relating to medicinal plants, transmitted to them by their elders. Their trust has also enabled a useful exchange between Indigenous knowledge and Western science.
Harris et al. BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine 2012, 12:245 Page 9 of 10
http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6882/12/245
Author details
1Neural Regeneration Laboratory and Ottawa Institute of Systems Biology, Department of Biochemistry, Microbiology, and Immunology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada. 2Centre for Research in Biopharmaceuticals and Biotechnology, Department of Biology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada. 3Centre for Indigenous Peoples’ Nutrition and Environment School of Dietetics and Human Nutrition McGill University, Ste. Anne de Bellevue, Québec, Canada. 4Natural Health Products and Metabolic Diseases Laboratory, Department of Pharmacology, Université de Montréal and Montreal Diabetes Research Center, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Received: 20 June 2012 Accepted: 30 November 2012
Published: 5 December 2012
References
1. Moerman D: Native american ethnobotany. Portland: Timber Press; 1998.
2. Grieve M: A Modern Herbal, Revised edn. Surrey (UK): Merchant Book Company Ltd; 1931.
3. Manchikanti L, Pampati V, Bakhit CE, Rivera JJ, Beyer CD, Damron KS, Barnhill RC: Effectiveness of lumbar facet joint nerve blocks in chronic low back pain: a randomized clinical trial. Pain Physician 2001, 4(1):101–117.
4. Rask MR: The omohyoideus myofascial pain syndrome: report of four patients. J Craniomandibular Pract 1984, 2(3):256–262.
5. Leduc C, Coonishish J, Haddad P, Cuerrier A: Plants used by the cree nation of eeyou istchee (quebec, canada) for the treatment of diabetes: a novel approach in quantitative ethnobotany. J Ethnopharmacol 2006, 105(1–2):55–63.
6. Pollex RL, Hanley AJ, Zinman B, Harris SB, Khan HM, Hegele RA: Metabolic syndrome in aboriginal canadians: prevalence and genetic associations. Atherosclerosis 2006, 184(1):121–129.
7. Bruce GB, Kliewer EV, Young TK, et al: Diabetes among the métis of canada: idefining the population, estimating the disease. Canadian Journal of Diabetes 2003, 27:442–448.
8. Kuzmina ED, Lejeune P, Dannenbaum D, Torrie J: Cree Diabetes Information System (CDIS) 2009 Annual report. Quebec: Cree Board of Health and Social Services of James Bay; 2010. Available from: http://creehealth.org/clinical-protocol ... ual-report.
9. Young TK, Reading J, Elias B, O'Neil JD: Type 2 diabetes mellitus in Canada's first nations: status of an epidemic in progress. CMAJ: Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne 2000, 163(5):561–566.
10. Yu CH, Zinman B: Type 2 diabetes and impaired glucose tolerance in aboriginal populations: a global perspective. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2007, 78(2):159–170.
11. Spoor DC, Martineau LC, Leduc C, Benhaddou-Andaloussi A, Meddah B, Harris C, Burt A, Fraser MH, Coonishish J, Joly E, et al: Selected plant species from the cree pharmacopoeia of northern quebec possess anti-diabetic potential. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 2006, 84(8–9):847–858.
12. Harbilas D, Martineau LC, Harris CS, Adeyiwola-Spoor DC, Saleem A, Lambert J, Caves D, Johns T, Prentki M, Cuerrier A, et al: Evaluation of the antidiabetic potential of selected medicinal plant extracts from the canadian boreal forest used to treat symptoms of diabetes: part II. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 2009, 87(6):479–492.
13. Haddad PS, Musallam L, Martineau LC, Harris CS, Lavoie L, Arnason JT, Foster B, Bennett SAL, Johns T, Cuerrier A, et al: Comprehensive evidence-based assessment and prioritization of potential antidiabetic medicinal plants: a case study from canadian eastern james Bay cree traditional medicine. Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine: eCAM 2012, 2012:893426.
14. Harris CS, Beaulieu LP, Fraser MH, McIntyre KL, Owen PL, Martineau LC, Cuerrier A, Johns T, Haddad PS, Bennett SA, et al: Inhibition of advanced glycation end product formation by medicinal plant extracts correlates with phenolic metabolites and antioxidant activity. Planta Med 2011, 77(2):196–204.
15. Dyck PJ, Davies JL, Wilson DM, Service FJ, Melton LJ 3rd, O'Brien PC: Risk factors for severity of diabetic polyneuropathy: intensive longitudinal assessment of the rochester diabetic neuropathy study cohort. Diabetes Care 1999, 22(9):1479–1486.
16. Honma H, Podratz JL, Windebank AJ: Acute glucose deprivation leads to apoptosis in a cell model of acute diabetic neuropathy. J Peripher Nerv Syst 2003, 8(2):65–74.
17. Sugimoto K, Murakawa Y, Sima AA: Diabetic neuropathy–a continuing enigma. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 2000, 16(6):408–433.
18. Harris CS, Lambert J, Saleem A, Coonishish J, Martineau LC, Cuerrier A, Haddad PS, Arnason JT, Bennett SAL: Anti-diabetic activity of extracts from needle, bark, and cone of picea glauca: Organ-specific protection from glucose toxicity and glucose deprivation. Pharm Biol 2008, 46:126–134.
19. Bonin F, Ryan SD, Migahed L, Mo F, Lallier J, Franks DJ, Arai H, Bennett SAL: Anti-apoptotic actions of the platelet activating factor acetylhydrolase I alpha 2 catalytic subunit. J Biol Chem 2004, 279:52425–52436.
20. Harris CS, Mo F, Migahed L, Chepelev L, Haddad PS, Wright JS, Willmore WG, Arnason JT, Bennett SA: Plant phenolics regulate neoplastic cell growth and survival: a quantitative structure-activity and biochemical analysis. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 2007, 85(11):1124–1138.
21. Ryan SD, Harris CS, Carswell CL, Baenziger JE, Bennett SAL: Heterogeneity in the sn-1 carbon chain of platelet-activating factor glycerophospholipids determines pro- or anti-apoptotic signaling in primary neurons. J Lipid Res 2008, 49(10):2250–2258.
22. Ryan SD, Harris CS, Mo F, Lee H, Hou ST, Bazan NG, Haddad PS, Arnason JT, Bennett SA: Platelet activating factor-induced neuronal apoptosis is initiated independently of its G-protein coupled PAF receptor and is inhibited by the benzoate orsellinic acid. J Neurochem 2007, 103(1):88–97.
23. Singleton VaR JA: Colorimetry of total phenolics with phosphomolbdic-phosphotungistic acid reagents. Am J Enol Vitic 1965, 16:144–158.
24. Farsi DA, Harris CS, Reid L, Bennett SA, Haddad PS, Martineau LC, Arnason JT: Inhibition of non-enzymatic glycation by silk extracts from a mexican land race and modern inbred lines of maize (Zea mays). Phytother Res 2008, 22:108–112.
25. Harris CS, Burt AJ, Saleem A, Le PM, Martineau LC, Haddad PS, Bennett SA, Arnason JT: A single HPLC-PAD-APCI/MS method for the quantitative comparison of phenolic compounds found in leaf, stem, root and fruit extracts of Vaccinium angustifolium. Phytochem Anal 2007, 18(2):161–169.
26. Tie L, Xu Y, Lin YH, Yao XH, Wu HL, Li YH, Shen ZF, Yu HM, Li XJ: Down-regulation of brain-pancreas relative protein in diabetic rats and by high glucose in PC12 cells: prevention by calpain inhibitors. J Pharmacol Sci 2008, 106(1):28–37.
27. Woronowicz A, Amith SR, Davis VW, Jayanth P, De Vusser K, Laroy W, Contreras R, Meakin SO, Szewczuk MR: Trypanosome trans-sialidase mediates neuroprotection against oxidative stress, serum/glucose deprivation, and hypoxia-induced neurite retraction in Trk-expressing PC12 cells. Glycobiology 2007, 17(7):725–734.
28. Bournival J, Francoeur MA, Renaud J, Martinoli MG: Quercetin and sesamin protect neuronal PC12 cells from high-glucose-induced oxidation, nitrosative stress, and apoptosis. Rejuvenation Res 2012, 15(3):322–333.
29. Martineau LC, Couture A, Spoor D, Benhaddou-Andaloussi A, Harris C, Meddah B, Leduc C, Burt A, Vuong T, Mai Le P, et al: Anti-diabetic properties of the canadian lowbush blueberry vaccinium angustifolium Ait. Phytomedicine 2006, 13:612–623.
30. Koshimura K, Tanaka J, Murakami Y, Kato Y: Involvement of nitric oxide in glucose toxicity on differentiated PC12 cells: prevention of glucose toxicity by tetrahydrobiopterin, a cofactor for nitric oxide synthase. Neurosci Res 2002, 43(1):31–38.
31. Vogt A, Kalb EN, Lazo JS: A scalable high-content cytotoxicity assay insensitive to changes in mitochondrial metabolic activity. Oncol Res 2004, 14(6):305–314.
32. Hu J, Starks CM, Williams RB, Rice SM, Norman VL, Olson KM, Hough GW, Goering MG, O'Neil-Johnson M, Eldridge GR: Secoiridoid glycosides from the pitcher plant sarracenia alata. Helvetica Chimica Acta 2009, 92(2):273–280.
33. Jay M, Lebreton P: Recherches chiniotaxinomiques sur les plantes vasculaires, 26. Les flavonoides des sarraceniacees, nepenthacees, droseracees et cephalotacees: etude critique de l'ordre des sarraceniales. Naturaliste Cannadienne 1972, 99:607–613.
34. Xu H, Shen J, Liu H, Shi Y, Li L, Wei M: Morroniside and loganin extracted from cornus officinalis have protective effects on rat mesangial cell proliferation exposed to advanced glycation end products by preventing oxidative stress. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 2006, 84(12):1267–1273.
35. Yokozawa T, Yamabe N, Kim HY, Kang KS, Hur JM, Park CH, Tanaka T: Protective effects of morroniside isolated from corni fructus against renal damage in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats. Biol Pharm Bull 2008, 31(7):1422–1428.
Harris et al. BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine 2012, 12:245 Page 10 of 10
http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6882/12/245
36. Wang W, Sun F, An Y, Ai H, Zhang L, Huang W, Li L: Morroniside protects
human neuroblastoma SH-SY5Y cells against hydrogen
peroxide-induced cytotoxicity. Eur J Pharmacol 2009, 613(1–3):19–23.
37. Aronson D: Hyperglycemia and the pathobiology of diabetic
complications. Adv Cardiol 2008, 45:1–16.
38. Brownlee M: The pathobiology of diabetic complications: a unifying
mechanism. Diabetes 2005, 54(6):1615–1625.
39. Wu CH, Yen GC: Inhibitory effect of naturally occurring flavonoids on the
formation of advanced glycation endproducts. J Agric Food Chem 2005,
53(8):3167–3173.
40. Varma SD: Inhibition of aldose reductase by flavonoids: possible
attenuation of diabetic complications. Prog Clin Biol Res 1986,
213:343–358.
41. Ha HJ, Kwon YS, Park SM, Shin T, Park JH, Kim HC, Kwon MS, Wie MB:
Quercetin attenuates oxygen-glucose deprivation- and
excitotoxin-induced neurotoxicity in primary cortical cell cultures.
Biol Pharm Bull 2003, 26(4):544–546.
42. Spencer JP, Rice-Evans C, Williams RJ: Modulation of pro-survival
Akt/protein kinase B and ERK1/2 signaling cascades by quercetin and its
in vivo metabolites underlie their action on neuronal viability.
J Biol Chem 2003, 278(37):34783–34793.
doi:10.1186/1472-6882-12-245
Cite this article as: Harris et al.: Characterizing the cytoprotective activity of Sarracenia purpurea L., a medicinal plant that inhibits glucotoxicity in PC12
- By ChefDean
- By LowieSomers
- By Adrien
- By Camden
- By stephenboss2000
- By Hedonista