Page 1 of 1

Huge Sarr.

Posted: Sat Jan 29, 2022 3:52 am
by thepitchergrower
I dunno, anyone else see this? Apparently it's a hybrid of S. 'Leah Wilkerson' x S. 'Brook's hybrid'. :shock: :shock: :shock:

Re: Huge Sarr.

Posted: Sat Jan 29, 2022 9:15 am
by Cross
Holy sheet! That's a big bit boy! I need to grow mine that big.

Sent from my SM-G998U using Tapatalk


Re: Huge Sarr.

Posted: Sat Jan 29, 2022 9:20 am
by IoanAdam
Incredible!

Re: Huge Sarr.

Posted: Sat Jan 29, 2022 2:55 pm
by Ewreck
So would the flower be even taller than that? Or would it be done before those tall ones grew?

Re: Huge Sarr.

Posted: Sat Jan 29, 2022 4:34 pm
by thepitchergrower
Ewreck wrote:So would the flower be even taller than that? Or would it be done before those tall ones grew?
I would guess it would be taller. There's not many pictures of this hybrid. Mainly because the owner has promised that he will never distribute, or sell it.

Re: Huge Sarr.

Posted: Sat Jan 29, 2022 4:55 pm
by MikeB
Jeez, and I thought "Doreen's Colossus" was tall:
Jerry Addington holding a Doreen's Colossus.jpg
Jerry Addington holding a Doreen's Colossus.jpg (109.21 KiB) Viewed 3045 times

Re: Huge Sarr.

Posted: Sat Jan 29, 2022 5:55 pm
by Ewreck
What are those red tags for?

Re: Huge Sarr.

Posted: Sat Jan 29, 2022 6:03 pm
by thepitchergrower
Ewreck wrote:What are those red tags for?
I'll bet it's for labeling the flower crosses. :)

Re: Huge Sarr.

Posted: Sat Jan 29, 2022 6:36 pm
by Panman
While big, the picture is a little deceiving. You'll notice they are all standing a foot or two behind the plant, causing a forced perspective.

Re: Huge Sarr.

Posted: Sat Jan 29, 2022 7:12 pm
by ChefDean
Panman wrote:While big, the picture is a little deceiving. You'll notice they are all standing a foot or two behind the plant, causing a forced perspective.
I was thinking that myself, plus the pic is taken at about waist height making the plant look taller. I would like to see a tape measure lined up next to it as verification of height. I'm not saying it's not a big plant, but I don't think it's as big as it's being represented.

Re: Huge Sarr.

Posted: Sat Jan 29, 2022 7:53 pm
by thepitchergrower
They say it can produce traps up to 145 cm. As Panman and Chef said, there's really no way we can verify that. :x

Re: Huge Sarr.

Posted: Sat Jan 29, 2022 8:40 pm
by ChefDean
thepitchergrower wrote:They say it can produce traps up to 145 cm. As Panman and Chef said, there's really no way we can verify that. :x
That's not what we said. We said that forced perspective is making the plant appear larger than what it actually may be. I suggested that a tape measure held next to the plant would be able to show a measurement of it's actual height.
Your posts suggest that you know the grower,
thepitchergrower wrote:Mainly because the owner has promised that he will never distribute, or sell it.
, so I would suggest you ask for another pic, staged just like this, only with the addition of a tape measure to show the height from the rhizome to the top of the hood.

Re: Huge Sarr.

Posted: Sat Jan 29, 2022 8:52 pm
by NightRaider
ChefDean wrote:Your posts suggest that you know the grower
I'm not sure if it was the original thread or not, but I've actually seen this exact picture posted on another forum at some point along with the no distribution stuff. I'm pretty sure OP just saw the same thread I did and has no relation to the grower.

Re: Huge Sarr.

Posted: Sat Jan 29, 2022 9:14 pm
by thepitchergrower
Apparently it's on facebook somewhere. :?

Re: Huge Sarr.

Posted: Sat Jan 29, 2022 9:54 pm
by ChefDean
thepitchergrower wrote:Apparently it's on facebook somewhere. :?
NightRaider wrote:I'm not sure if it was the original thread or not, but I've actually seen this exact picture posted on another forum at some point along with the no distribution stuff. I'm pretty sure OP just saw the same thread I did and has no relation to the grower.
I see, thank you for the clarification.